JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 15, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez

✓Claimant Sandra Marlylin Solarte Idrobo Vs Consejo Superior De La Judicatura Sala Jurisdiccion Disciplinaria·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • No se encontró vicio al ordenar que litigio contra Asociación Indígena fuera dirimido por jurisdicción especial indígena
Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional frente al cumplimiento de sus fallos
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
  • Improcedencia por cuanto inconformidad de la actora no guarda relación con parte resolutiva de sentencia T-996/07
Sentencia De Tutela
  • Cumplimiento obligatorio
  • Responsabilidad objetiva frente al cumplimiento y de ser insatisfecho, podrá interponerse la sanción de desacato
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-966/07.

La Corte concluye que, la solicitud de la actora no guarda relación directa con la parte resolutiva del fallo y la demandante no ha acudido a la primera autoridad llamada a velar por el cumplimiento de la sentencia, se decide declarar improcedente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR IMPROCEDENTE la solicitud de cumplimiento elevada por la senora Sandra Marylin Solarte Idrobo.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.