JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 27, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant German Espinosa Mejia

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.

Considera la Sala Plena que al Magistrado Sustanciador le asistió la razón al proferir el auto de rechazo, en tanto en el escrito de corrección no se planteó una acusación que cumpliera con las exigencias del juicio de sustitución.

Con base en lo anterior, se CONFIRMÓ en su integridad el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto del 11 de diciembre de 2015, proferido por el Magistrado Sustanciador Alejandro Linares Cantillo, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda interpuesta por el ciudadano Germán Espinosa Mejía.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.