JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Leonidas Mercado

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Jueces de un mismo distrito judicial
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de la referencia al Tribunal Superior del distrito Judicial de Cali – Sala Civil, para que dicha Corporación dirima el conflicto de competencia y decida cuál de los Juzgados debe conocer y tramitar la tutela incoada por el accionante contra la empresa TISSOT S.A., en liquidación, debido a que los despachos judiciales enfrentados, solamente tienen un superior jerárquico común, que en este caso es el referido Tribunal, teniendo en cuenta que dichos despachos judiciales pertenecen al mismo distrito judicial.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Corte Constitucional en Sala Plena,
  2. RESULVE:
  3. REMITIR el expediente de la referencia al H. Tribunal Superior del distrito Judicial de Cali - Sala Civil, para que dicha Corporacion dirima el conflicto de competencia y decida cual de los Juzgados debe conocer y tramitar la accion de tutela incoada por Leonidas Mercado, contra la empresa TISSOT S.A., en liquidacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.