JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 19, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant --·Respondent --

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencias.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria, para que defina cuál de los dos juzgados civiles municipales es competente para conocer de la acción de tutela incoada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Ministerio de Hacienda.

La Corte explicó que los mencionados juzgados son integrantes de la jurisdicción ordinaria, a cuya cabeza se encuentra la Corte Suprema de Justicia, y es a quien le corresponde dirimir el conflicto planteado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Primero. REMITASE el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria, para que ella defina cual de los dos juzgados civiles municipales es competente para conocer de la accion de tutela incoada por ALEXANDER ALVAREZ MARTINEZ, contra el Ministerio de Hacienda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.