JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 11, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Orden al Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social de presentar informe en relación con los cambios realizados en la Resolución 5073 de 2013, respecto del procedimie
Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y La Vida
  • Seguimiento al cumplimiento de la orden vigésima cuarta de la sentencia T-760/08
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

En el trámite de seguimiento a la orden vigésima cuarta de la sentencia T-760/08, se ordena al Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social presentar un informe respecto a los indicaciones establecidas en el numeral sexto del presente auto.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Ordenar al Ministerio de Salud y Proteccion Social que, dentro de los diez (10) dias habiles siguientes a la comunicacion del presente auto, presente el informe a que se refiere el considerando num. 6 de esta decision.
  2. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion a comunicar lo aqui decidido al peticionario y al Ministerio de Salud y Proteccion Social, adjuntando copia de este proveido y de la solicitud ciudadana.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.