JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Ana Lid Lopez Silva

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inaplicó el inciso 2º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por inconstitucional.

En consecuencia, se resolvió el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia y el Juzgado 10 Civil del Circuito de Medellín, en el sentido de determinar que la competencia para tramitar la tutela instaurada por la ciudadana de la referencia el corresponde al mencionado Tribunal.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. INAPLICAR, por inconstitucional, el inciso 2º del artículo 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000. En consecuencia. DECIDIR la colisión de competencias suscitada entre el Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia y el Juzgado 10 Civil del Circuito de Medellín, en el sentido de determinar que la competencia para tramitar la tutela instaurada por Ana Lid López Silva le corresponde al Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia.
  2. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.