JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 5, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Procuraduria General De La Nacion·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Impacto Fiscal
  • Procedencia
  • Procedimiento y requisitos
  • Competencia de la Corte Constitucional
  • Contenido y alcance
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se CONCEDE la apertura del incidente de impacto fiscal presentada por la Procuradora General de la Nación (E), contra el segundo resuelve de la sentencia C-101/13.

En consecuencia, se otorga un término de 30 días para el jefe del Ministerio Público sustente la solicitud del incidente impetrado, conforme a lo prescrito por el artículo 334 de la Constitución Política y la Ley 1695 de 2013..

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONCEDER la apertura del incidente de impacto fiscal presentada por la Procuradora General de la Nación (E), mediante escrito del 20 de junio de 2013.
  2. Segundo. OTORGAR un término de treinta (30) días hábiles contados a partir de la fecha de notificación de la presente providencia, para que el Procurador General de la Nación, sustente la solicitud de apertura del incidente de impacto fiscal, conforme a lo prescrito por el artículo 334 de la Constitución Política y la Ley 1695 de 2013.
  3. Notifíquese, publíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.