JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 12, 1995

A- de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Dulcey Erazo Fanny·Respondent Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Competencia De Tutela. Improcedencia De Sentencia Inhibitoria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó el envío del expediente al Tribunal de la referencia para que adoptara la decisión que corresponda a efecto de su remisión al organismo judicial que considere competente, por factor territorial, en relación con el proceso de tutela promovido por la accionante, para que éste determine si avoca el conocimiento del mismo.

La Corte consideró que el mencionado Tribunal solamente se limitó a declararse inhibido para resolver la acción de tutela, “por falta de competencia”, sin disponer lo conducente para facilitar el acceso a la administración de justicia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Sexta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. 1. ORDENAR el envio del expediente al Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Popayan, Sala Civil Laboral, para que adopte la decision que corresponda a efecto de su remision al organismo judicial que considere competente, por factor territorial, en relacion con el proceso de tutela promovido por Fanny Dulcey Erazo contra la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social -Seccional Popayan-, para que este determine si avoca el conocimiento del mismo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.