A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez
✓Claimant Eduardo Barrios Valencia·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por improcedente, toda vez que dentro de las normas que regulan la actividad de la Corporación no se contempla la posibilidad de suspender provisionalmente una discus
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
El memorialista solicitó la suspensión del numeral segundo de la sentencia C-390/14y la Corte rechazó esta petición, por IMPROCEDENTE.
Precisó, que dentro de las normas que regulan la actividad de la Corporación en materia de procedimientos y actuaciones que deban surtirse ante ella, no se contempla la posibilidad de suspender provisionalmente una discusión de constitucionalidad.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de suspension provisional del numeral 2o de la sentencia C-390 de 2014, presentada por el senor Eduardo Barrios Valencia.
- SEGUNDO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.