JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 19, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Ernesto Rey Cantor

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto De Marzo 1/02
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Absoluta
  • Objeto
  • Confrontación de normas demandadas con totalidad de preceptos de la Constitución
Cosa Juzgada Relativa
  • Objeto
  • Advertencia expresa e inequívoca en la decisión
Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda Por Cosa Juzgada Absoluta
  • Condicionamiento del sentido del precepto legal
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se confirmó en todas sus partes el auto mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia en contra del literal a) del Art. 16 de la Ley 31 de 1992 en el proceso D-3927, toda vez que es claro que los cargos de la demanda ya fueron analizados por la Corte y que los cargos del recurso de súplica no tienen la fuerza de convicción necesaria para justificar la revocación del rechazo de la demanda.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Por las razones estudiadas, CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del 1o de marzo de 2002, proferido por el despacho del magistrado ponente en el proceso D-3927, doctor Rodrigo Escobar Gil, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Ernesto Rey Cantor en contra del literal a) del articulo 16 de la Ley 31 de 1992.
  2. Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.