JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 27, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Noira Stella Gonzalez Gonzalez  En Respresentacion De Daniela Fernanda Gonzalez Gonzalez Vs. Ars Cafesalud

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De Ulloa –Valle Del Cauca- Y Juzgado Sexto Penal Para Adolescentes De Santiago De Cali. Se Resolvio Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De Ulloa, Valle Del Cauca, Para Que Resuelva La Accion De Tutela En Cuestion.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Lugar donde ocurrió amenaza o vulneración de derechos fundamentales o donde se produjeron sus efectos
Accion De Tutela Contra Ars Cafesalud
  • Competencia de Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal
Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia de todos los jueces de la República
  • Competencia por factor territorial
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REMITIR, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Ulloa, Valle del Cauca, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Daniela Fernanda Gonzalez Gonzalez contra la ARS Cafesalud.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto al Juzgado
  3. Sexto. Penal para Adolescentes con funciones de Control de Garantias de Santiago de Cali, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.