JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 23, 1996

A- de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Sandra Consuelo Charry Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia En Tutela. Desacato.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia En Tutela
  • Decisión sobre incumplimiento de fallo
Desacato De Tutela
  • Controversia entre jueces sobre competencia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inhibió para resolver el conflicto negativo de competencia del incidente de desacato entre dos Juzgados por carecer de competencia para ello, toda vez que es el Tribunal superior jerárquico territorial o material el competente para dirimir el conflicto negativo de competencia del incidente de desacato.

La Corte remitió Tribunal correspondiente el expediente para que resuelva el asunto de este proceso.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. INHIBIRSE para resolver el conflicto negativo de competencia del incidente de desacato entre los Juzgados Unico Promiscuo Municipal de Santa María, Huila y
  2. Cuarto. Civil del Circuito de Neiva, por carecer de competencia para ello.
  3. Segundo. REMITIR al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Neiva, el expediente materia del conflicto negativo de competencia del incidente de desacato, por ser el competente, a fin de que dirima éste.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.