A- de 1992
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo
✓Claimant Jose Jesus Laverde Ospina
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inadmisión
- Carácter obligatorio
- Improcedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Inadmitieron las demandas acumuladas y otorgó un plazo de tres días para que realicen las correcciones indicando los motivos por los cuales estima inconstitucionales los preceptos acusados.
Así mismo, recuerda que si la demanda trata de una impugnación contra una sentencia de tutela proferida por la Corte Constitucional, en este tipo de fallos, no procede recurso alguno.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- fallos no procede recurso alguno y que, por el contrario, "la doctrina constitucional enunciada en las sentencias de la Corte constitucional, mientras no sea modificada por ésta, será criterio auxiliar obligatorio para las autoridades y corrige la jurisprudencia"., (artículo 23 del Decreto 2067 de 1991).
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.