JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 4, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derechos A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Seguimiento a las órdenes vigésima primera y vigésima segunda de la Sentencia T-760 de 2008
Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Acceder a la solicitud de prórroga para el cumplimiento del auto A.278/13
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se resuelve la solicitud de prórroga impetrada por la Comisión de Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-760/08y de Reforma Estructural del Sistema de Salud y Seguridad Social –CSR-, para el cumplimiento de lo establecido en el Auto 278/13.

Ante la complejidad del tema objeto de experticia y del volumen de los documentos sometidos a consideración del perito constitucional voluntario, la Sala encuentra justificado el motivo de la solicitud y decide ACCEDER a ella.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Acceder a la solicitud de prorroga presentada por la Comision de Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-760/08 y de Reforma Estructural del Sistema de Salud y Seguridad Social -CSR- y, en consecuencia, tener en cuenta, al momento de hacer la valoracion correspondiente, el concepto de 27 de enero de 2014.
  2. Segundo. La Secretaria General expedira la comunicacion correspondiente, adjuntando copia de este auto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.