JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Beatriz Helena Sanchez Toro Y Otros Vs. Consejo Superior De La Judicatura - Sala Administrativa

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Medellin Y El Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo De Cundinamarca. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Medellin Sala Laboral
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Acto Administrativo General Dictado Por Autoridad Nacional
  • Conocimiento de Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo como mecanismo transitorio
Accion De Tutela Contra Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Competencia del Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca
Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Lugar donde ocurrió amenaza o vulneración de derechos fundamentales o donde se produjeron sus efectos
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitase, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Medellin, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por Beatriz Helena Sanchez Toro, Luis Horacio Velez Escobar, John Raymon Rua Castano y Rafael Antonio Plazas Nino, contra el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura.
  2. Informese esta decision al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Cuarta, Subseccion A.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.