JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 25, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Roberto Soto Figueroa

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Consejo Superior De La Judicatura Sala Disciplinaria Y La Corte Suprema De Justicia Sala De Casación Penal. Remitase El Expediente A La Sala De Casación Penal De La Corte Suprema De Justicia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Aplicación
  • Respeto de la competencia a prevención
  • Inaplicación para el caso cuando el demandado es el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura
  • Inaplicación por cuanto se hace imposible surtir segunda instancia
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitir a la Sala de Casacion Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el expediente de la accion de tutela interpuesta por Roberto Soto Figueroa contra la Sala Disciplinaria del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura y la Sala Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cordoba, para que se resuelva de manera inmediata sobre la impugnacion formulada.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.