A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
✓Claimant Mauricio Baron Pinilla
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma rechazo por haber operado el fenómeno de cosa juzgada
- Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica. el rechazo se dio por la configuración del fenómeno de la cosa juzgada constitucional.
Teniendo en cuenta que el actor no expuso ninguna razón para controvertir la providencia recurrida, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMARLA, por incumplimiento de la carga mínima argumentativa.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del 13 de diciembre de 2017 dictado por el magistrado sustanciador Alberto Rojas Rios, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda identificada con el numero de radicacion D-12522.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.