A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez
✓Claimant Alvaro Ernesto Barrero Ortiz
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por improcedente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que ordenó el rechazo de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad la referencia.
Luego de verificar el respectivo término de ejecutoria, la Sala Plena decide RECHAZAR POR IMPROCEDENTE el recurso de súplica presentado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR POR EXTEMPORANEO el recurso de suplica presentado por el ciudadano Alvaro Ernesto Barrero Ortiz contra el auto del 16 de diciembre de 2014, proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, que rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.
- SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
- Notifiquese, comuniquese y cumplase.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.