JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 17, 1992

A- de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Sanin Greiffenstein

✓Claimant Ricardo Alvarez Mosquera Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Admision De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Articulos Transitorios De La Constitucion Politica
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Admitió la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra los artículos 380 y 59 transitorio de la Constitución Nacional, la cual fue acumulada al expediente D-017 y D-051.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ADMITESE la demanda presentada por el ciudadano JAIME HORTA DIAZ contra los articulos 380 y 59 transitorio de la Constitucion Nacional, la cual ha sido acumulada al expediente D-017 y D-051.
  2. Segundo. Fijese en lista el presente negocio por el termino de diez (10) dias en la
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.