JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 26, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Hernando De Jesus Franco Bernal

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 28 De Noviembre De 2005 Del Magistrado Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra Que Rechazo La Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Objeto
  • Negado por haberse demandado disposiciones jurídicas inexistentes
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la sala Plena de la Corporacion en ejercicio de sus competencias
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. CONFIRMAR el auto del veintiocho (22) de noviembre de 2005, por el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Hernando de Jesus Franco Bernal contra mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra "cualesquiera normas que pudieren llegar a expedirse, violando los derechos fundamentales que nuestra Constitucion Politica consagra a favor de todos los propietarios, conductores y usuarios de motocicletas en el pais y, de contera, sus familiares y ayudantes".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.