JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 18, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Cardona Herrera Guillermo·Respondent Dian Y Adpostal De Neiva

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la tutela promovida por el accionante contra la Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales y Administración Postal, seccional Neiva, a partir del auto proferido por el Tribunal respectivo, toda vez que como ya se dijo, no resulta aplicable lo dispuesto en el Art. 1 del Decreto 1382 del 12 de junio de 2000 por ser contrario a la Carta Política.

Por lo anterior, se ordenó remitir el expediente al mencionado Tribunal para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Guillermo Cordon Herrera, contra la Direccion de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales y Administracion Postal, seccional Neiva, a partir del auto del (30) de agosto de 2000 proferido por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Neiva, Sala Civil, Familia, Agraria, visible a folio 49 del expediente.
  2. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente por Secretaria General, al Tribunal Administrativo de Huila, para que, de manera inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.