A- de 1996
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
✓Claimant Jose Luis Fonseca Ariza
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Extemporaneidad de corrección
- Extemporaneidad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
La Corporación ordenó que se archivara el proceso de la referencia porque se aprecia que el escrito presentado por el demandante no responde al recurso de súplica y se consideró extemporáneo.
Se le advierte al actor que el rechazo de la presente demanda no le impide instaurar una nueva en relación con el mismo acto.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. Ordenar que se archive el proceso de la referencia.
- Segundo. Advertir al actor que el rechazo de la presente demanda en ningun momento le impide instaurar una nueva en relacion con el mismo acto.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.