JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 22, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Alvaro Vasquez Melo

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto no existió vulneración del debido proceso
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU074/14.

La petición de nulidad se fundamentó en la omisión, por parte de la Corte Constitucional, de estudiar cada uno de los defectos señalados en la sentencia de la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, proferida dentro del proceso adelantado en contra del accionante, por falsedad ideológica en documento público.

La Corte encontró que no se vulneró el derecho fundamental al debido proceso, porque en ejercicio del trámite de revisión de la acción de tutela se analizaron de manera razonable, todos los asuntos de relevancia constitucional que en ella se presentaron.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU-074 de 2014, presentada por el ciudadano Álvaro Vásquez Melo.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comuníquese la presente providencia al solicitante, informándole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentMauricio González CuervoDissentMaría Victoria Calle Correa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.