JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 26, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Pedro Vicente Velásquez Rincon

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 906 De 2004 Articulo 318. Codigo De Procedimiento Penal. Impedimento Del Señor Procurador General De La Nación Para Conceptuar En El Proceso De La Referencia. Aceptado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nacion
  • Intervención en la expedición de la norma acusada
Principio De Imparcialidad Del Funcionario Judicial En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Aplicación
  • No existencia en sentido estricto de partes con pretensiones opuestas
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. Aceptar el impedimento manifestado por el doctor Edgardo Jose Maya Villazon como Procurador General de la Nacion, para actuar como tal en el proceso D-6018 en el cual el ciudadano Pedro Vicente Velasquez Rincon, solicita a la Corte declarar la inexequibilidad del articulo 318 de la Ley 906 de 2004, "Por la cual se expide el Codigo de Procedimiento Penal".
  2. Segundo. En consecuencia, el senor Procurador General de la Nacion, en ejercicio de la funcion que le asigna el articulo 7o del Decreto Ley 262 de 2000 designara al funcionario que en representacion del Ministerio Publico debera rendir el concepto correspondiente en este proceso, durante el resto del termino que para el efecto corresponde al Ministerio Publico, una vez se levante la suspension del termino.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.