A- de 2025
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Vladimir Fernández Andrade
✓Claimant Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera·Respondent --
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- No aceptar impedimento manifestado por magistrado, por no estar incurso en ninguna de las causales taxativas
- Naturaleza jurídica
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Impedimento presentado por la magistrada Diana Fajardo Rivera.
La magistrada argumentó que estaba incursa en la causal prevista en el artículo 25 del Decreto 2067 de 1991, relativa a tener interés en la decisión.
La Sala no encontró acreditados los elementos necesarios para determinar que la doctora Diana Fajardo Rivera pudiera beneficiarse o perjudicarse con la decisión que se adopte en el proceso de la referencia y, por eso, decidió declarar INFUNDADO el impedimento analizado en esta oportunidad.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- Único: DECLARAR INFUNDADO el impedimento presentado por la magistrada Diana Fajardo Rivera para decidir en sede de revisión el proceso de tutela T-10.480.594, promovido por el señor Aldo Herman Parada Galvis en contra de la Procuraduría General de la Nación.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.