JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 21, 1993

A- de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant German Cavelier Gaviria

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechazo La Demanda De Tratado . Acta De Barahona.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Confirmó las razones expuestas en el auto suplicado por el cual se rechazó la demanda contra el Acta de Barahona, al considerar que carece de competencia para conocer de la demanda que se formula porque su naturaleza no es ni formal ni materialmente la de un Tratado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. PRIMERO. Confirmar por las razones expuestas el auto suplicado por el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano GERMAN CAVELIER GAVIRIA contra el ACTA DE BARAHONA.
  3. SEGUNDO. Archívese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.