A- de 1993
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía
✓Claimant Armando Novoa Garcia
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad por no ser competente la Corte Constitucional para conocer de ella.
Sin embargo, la incompetencia de esta Corporación, origina, al contrario, la competencia del Consejo de Estado, de conformidad con lo dispuesto por el Art. 237, numeral 2.
La Corte advirtió a los demandantes que contra este auto procedía el recurso de súplica.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- R E S U E L V E :
- Primero. Rechazar la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada por Armando Novoa García y otros, en relación con el Decreto No. 2171 de diciembre 30 de 1992, por no ser competente la Corte Constitucional para conocer de ella.
- Segundo. ADVERTIR a los demandantes que contra este auto procede el recurso de súplica, que podrá interponerse dentro de los tres (3) días siguientes a su notificación.
- Tercero. Ejecutoriado este auto, por la Secretaría General ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.