JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 25, 1993

A- de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Departamento Administrativo De Seguridad -Das-

✓
Topic · hard data
Falta De Competencia De La Corte Para Absolver La Consulta Planteada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Rechazó la solicitud de consulta pretendida por el actor de la referencia motivo por el cual se abstuvo de formular consideraciones sobre el caso en cuestión.

Lo anterior, al considerar que no es función de la Corporación emitir conceptos sobre el comportamiento que deba asumir un funcionario, organismo o entidad estatal en casos concretos.

Es preciso indicar que la única posibilidad de consulta a la Corte está referida a sus propias sentencias en asuntos constitucionales, a petición de un juez de la República para proteger derechos constitucionales no considerados en aquéllas (Art. 24 del Decreto 2067 de 1991).

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. RECHAZAR, por falta de competencia, la solicitud de concepto formulada por el Director del Deparatamento Administrativo de Seguridad -DAS- en el asunto de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.