JurídicoESEN

Recusals and absences of Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

Decisions in which Antonio did not take part, because of an accepted recusal or an absence. 412 in total.

✓Hard data: recorded in the Court's signature graph (did not sit on the chamber that decided). An accepted recusal is not always distinguished from an absence.
Back to profileDissenting and concurring opinions
A. 1729/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1728/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1727/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1726/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1725/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1724/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1723/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1722/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1721/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1720/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1719/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1718/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1717/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1716/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1715/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1714/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1713/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1712/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1711/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part
See the ruling page →
A. 1710/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part

Inexistencia De Conflicto Entre Jurisdicciones-Elemento Subjetivo-No Existe Manifestación Expresa Por Parte De La Justicia Penal Militar En La Que Se Atribuya O Rechace La Competencia Para Conocer De Las Diligencias.

See the ruling page →
A. 1709/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part

Inexistencia De Conflicto Entre Jurisdicciones-Elemento Subjetivo-Ambos Jueces Concuerdan Que El Caso Le Compete A La Justicia Penal Militar.

See the ruling page →
A. 1708/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part

Conocimiento De Actos Sujetos Al Derecho Administrativo, Cuando Esté Involucrada Una Entidad Pública.

See the ruling page →
A. 1707/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part

Acción De Lesividad Promovida Por Entidad Pública Contra Acto Administrativo Mediante El Cual Concedió Prestación Pensional

See the ruling page →
A. 1706/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part

Demanda Reivindicatoria Interpuesta Por Una Sociedad De Economía Mixta Contra Un Particular.

See the ruling page →
A. 1705/22Order (Auto)2022Did not take part

Acción De Lesividad Promovida Por Entidad Pública Contra Acto Administrativo Mediante El Cual Concedió Prestación Pensional

See the ruling page →